The
death of journalism is a statement that many people are using to describe the
fading of print journalism from our society. Throughout both pieces each of the
authors make points to both verify and take away from the argument that
journalism is “dying.” Certainly in the last decade since the emergence of the
internet it has been tough for newspapers and other facets of print media to
break stories before someone that is blogging from a laptop that is wirelessly
connected or someone who is tweeting from a cell phone. No longer do we see
Edwin Lahey’s story about the murder of Richard Loeb from inside a prison
before we see it on the internet.
The
thought that journalism is dying is not appropriate to say but the term I
believe that should be used is evolving. At this point there are still
newspapers going out daily, while circulation may not be what it was in 1924
the papers are still standing. They are important because of the point that
Catherine Ford makes in her piece from The StarPhoenix that print news can be
if stored properly saved forever, unlike digital pieces where as hard as you
try to save them over long periods of time they may still be lost forever. The
only problem the emergence of online journalism presents is who is a journalist
and what is credible, as we spoke about in class last Thursday. There are
parody accounts of almost anyone who is in mainstream media on twitter, and people
are constantly posting false news all over the internet. This though can be
overcome and I believe that the internet’s role in journalism is a great thing.
Live scoring updates, tweets about injuries and real time news all at the click
of a button. The future is certainly going to be interesting for the quickly
evolving world of journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment